<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Why not to make a read-only field required</title>
	<atom:link href="http://siebelconsultant.net/why-not-to-make-a-read-only-field-required-2/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://siebelconsultant.net/why-not-to-make-a-read-only-field-required-2/</link>
	<description>Diary of a Siebel Consultant</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Mon, 14 Jun 2010 11:54:32 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=3.0.1</generator>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Wimpatico</title>
		<link>http://siebelconsultant.net/why-not-to-make-a-read-only-field-required-2/comment-page-1/#comment-18</link>
		<dc:creator>El Wimpatico</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 06 Jun 2007 08:09:21 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siebelconsultant.net/why-not-to-make-a-read-only-field-required-2/#comment-18</guid>
		<description>LFMAO</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>LFMAO</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: El Roel</title>
		<link>http://siebelconsultant.net/why-not-to-make-a-read-only-field-required-2/comment-page-1/#comment-17</link>
		<dc:creator>El Roel</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Wed, 28 Mar 2007 09:34:09 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siebelconsultant.net/why-not-to-make-a-read-only-field-required-2/#comment-17</guid>
		<description>SOME Siebel Consultants don&#039;t unit test... They are mostly named Wim.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>SOME Siebel Consultants don&#8217;t unit test&#8230; They are mostly named Wim.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Wim</title>
		<link>http://siebelconsultant.net/why-not-to-make-a-read-only-field-required-2/comment-page-1/#comment-16</link>
		<dc:creator>Wim</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 21:05:56 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siebelconsultant.net/why-not-to-make-a-read-only-field-required-2/#comment-16</guid>
		<description>I should have done a unit test, but it was not ment that al those changes where released on the UAT environment.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>I should have done a unit test, but it was not ment that al those changes where released on the UAT environment.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Tom</title>
		<link>http://siebelconsultant.net/why-not-to-make-a-read-only-field-required-2/comment-page-1/#comment-15</link>
		<dc:creator>Tom</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Thu, 22 Mar 2007 20:01:57 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://siebelconsultant.net/why-not-to-make-a-read-only-field-required-2/#comment-15</guid>
		<description>Siebel consultants don&#039;t unit test???</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Siebel consultants don&#8217;t unit test???</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>
